|
UK terror detentions
'barbaric'
MPs attack 'concrete coffins' in prison
Martin Bright, Jason Burke and Burhan Wazir
January 20, 2002
The Observer
British terror suspects are being held in conditions condemned as
barbaric by the Home Office's own medical experts and described by
lawyers who have visited them as 'concrete coffins'.
Opposition politicians last night
called for an immediate investigation into conditions in Belmarsh
high-security prison in south-east London, where seven Islamist
suspects have been held without charge since their arrest last
month.
Claims that the detainees - not
convicted of any offence - have been denied access to lawyers and
had their basic human rights violated come as police and MI5 were
drawing up plans for fresh arrests.
The Belmarsh detainees are locked up
for 22 hours a day and do not see daylight. On detention they were
given no access to lawyers or to their families, while being given
five days to appeal against their internment.
They are unable to speak to their
families in Arabic without the presence of an approved translator
who visits once a week. In some cases, clearance for phone calls to
lawyers was approved only last week.
Complaints lodged with the Home
Secretary have received no response. These include concerns about
men being subjected to body searches by women prison officers,
unacceptable to Muslims. They have also been denied prayer
facilities except for 15 minutes on a Friday without an imam.
Liberal Democrat Home Affairs
spokesman Norman Baker said: 'These are very serious allegations
that require immediate investigation. If true, it is shameful that
the British Government has allowed these men to be treated in this
way, especially when they have committed no crime. Both the British
and US governments have lost the moral high ground.'
In 1996 the Government's former chief
medical officer, Sir Donald Acheson, made a stinging internal report
to the Prison Service, concluding that conditions in special
security units such as those at Belmarsh could contribute to mental
illness. Amnesty International said later that lack of adequate
daylight, exercise, medical treatment and educational facilities led
to a swift deterioration of mental and physical health.
The claims about Belmarsh will cause
serious embarrassment to the Government, under growing pressure to
oppose the American treatment of Taliban and al- Qaeda prisoners
held in Cuba.
This week Amnesty International will
meet lawyers representing men detained in Britain under the new
legisla tion. 'We want to ensure they are held in humane conditions
and that everything is all right,' a spokesman said.
Gareth Peirce, who represents several
detainees, told The Observer: 'These men have been buried alive in
concrete coffins and have been told the legislation provides for
their detention for life without trial.'
Inayat Bunglawala, of the Muslim
Council of Britain, said: 'The war on terrorism was meant to be a
war on behalf of civilised values. It is crucial that the values we
hold dear are upheld. Otherwise this military victory will be
undermined by a moral defeat. We are concerned for the treatment of
Muslim prisoners in Belmarsh. Their dietary and their religious
requirements should be respected above all.'
Roger Bingham of the civil rights
organisation Liberty said: 'These reports would be cause for concern
if someone had been convicted of a serious crime, but these people
haven't even been charged. The whole policy of internment offends
the core principles of British justice.'
The Home Office said yesterday: 'All
detainees enjoy the same rights as any other category A prisoner.
They have the same access to legal representation, their families
and their fellow prisoners.'
Police investigating Islamic
activists in Britain are worried about alienating the Muslim
community in Britain, but believe intelligence gained from al-Qaeda
suspects picked up in Europe, Afghanistan and the Far East will
provide new lines of investigation in Britain.
One Whitehall source told The
Observer: 'If MI5 believes people are a threat to national security,
we will have them arrested. We asked the Home Secretary for these
new anti-terrorist powers. Now we have them, we are going to use
them.'
·
Additional reporting by Nick Pelham (Source:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/waronterrorism/story/0,1373,636493,00.html) |