Verily, Allâh enjoins Justice and Correctness, and helping kith and kin and forbids lewd acts and all kinds of evil deed and oppression. He admonishes you so that you may take heed. (An-Nahl: 90)

Clarke setting out terror policy

The home secretary is to set out his plans for foreign terror suspects after law lords ruled their detention without charge breaks human rights laws. Charles Clarke is believed to be considering a form of house detention for the 12 men affected by the ruling.

Deals are already being sought to deport some of the men, who are from Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt and Jordan.

Mr Clarke will address MPs a day after the remaining four Britons held at Guantanamo Bay returned to the UK.

BBC political editor Andrew Marr said he had been told the "least bad" option being discussed for the 12 detainees was "some kind of secure detention at home".

Such an option would involve "very strict rules about not being allowed to use computers and so on". They would also be watched closely.

Such arrangements are already being used for one suspect freed because of mental illness.

Most of the terror suspects are being held indefinitely at Belmarsh prison, in London, under emergency powers brought in after the 11 September 2001 attacks in the US.

Under the government's anti-terrorism legislation, they would be freed if they agreed to leave the UK. They cannot be deported as they might face torture or death in their countries of origin.

'Second best'

The law lords ruled last month that the measures were incompatible with European human rights laws. They were particularly worried that the detention powers were discriminatory as they applied only to foreign terror suspects.

That concern could mean any house arrest plan covers all terror suspects, whether UK citizens or from overseas.

Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy said his first preference would be for any suspects to be put on trial, possibly using wire-tap evidence.

A house arrest plan would be a "second best option", he said, especially as some senior legal figures had warned the proposal could amount to indefinite detention.

"The difficulty that arises here is that we could find ourselves still out of step with aspects of the European Convention [on Human Rights]," said Mr Kennedy.

Court action threat

Human rights group Liberty has welcomed Mr Clarke's decision to respond to the Lords' criticism.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the group, said: "The new home secretary is to be commended for finally responding to the damning ruling that detention without trial is alien to our democracy."

She said she hoped the government would introduce laws that "conform fully" with European human rights legislation.

Solicitor Gareth Peirce, who represents eight of the detainees, has already warned if there is no swift government action on the issue, the detainees could ask the European Court of Human Rights to get involved.

The detainees took their case to the House of Lords after the Court of Appeal backed the Home Office's powers to hold them without limit or charge, saying there was a state of emergency threatening the life of the nation.

The government opted out of part of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the right to a fair trial in order to bring in anti-terrorism legislation in response to the 11 September attacks.

Source: BBC News
26 January 2005