|
Liberty - Hypocrisy and Double Standards
The supine nature of muslims living in Britain or
the west generally knows no bounds it seems .A harsh statement
indeed and one that ought to be backed by evidence for sure .Well
lets start with the war on terror or more accurately the war on
muslims who are all branded terrorists merely because of their
faith. The majority of ordinary muslims despite their failure to
articulate their feelings understand that the y are labelled as the
enemy within -the 5th columnists .Muslims are the target of the
assault on civil liberties in the west which has led to
unprecedented injustice .The not so ordinary ones ,in other words
those who shuffle in the corridors of power are less vocal -indeed
it is baffling that there is so little said about the issue -the
focus appears to be on condemnation of the "bad apples"- Abu Hamza
is now facing further charges ,this time for incitement to racial
hatred in the main. Quite extraordinary when you think that new laws
were brought in allowing the removal of citizenship only to get him
.He was later imprisoned to be extradited and now he is to be put on
trial here. Whether you agree with Abu Hamza is irrelevant -why does
one man attract so much resource and energy of the state .Moreover
why does no one even question the mushrooming legal charges that he
faces -he was after all a free man a few months ago. The campaign
against a man who is disabled and requires medication even to sit in
court to hear charges against him, have to be viewed against the
backdrop of the rising tide of anti-muslim prejudice unleashed by
the war on terror - not my words but those of the Director of Public
Prosecutions [DPP] .The statistics are clear -a 302 per cent
increase in stops and searches ,and 50 per cent increase in racial
attacks. Over 600 arrests and less than 100 charged with a less than
one percent conviction rate - even then the convictions include
Irish paramilitary members. The DPP says that the situation for
Muslims is akin to the use of the notorious "sus" laws in the 1970s
,when black men were the overwhelming victims. This led to riots in
Brixton and other major cities in England. There was a massive
campaign against abuse of power by the police. Bernie Grant and
others were regularly in the media accusing the police and
government of racism - there were large demonstrations and public
outcry. Paul Boateng was a civil rights lawyer and made his name
criticising police brutality - he now sits in the cabinet which is
vicious in its use of state terror. As for the situation which the
DPP says is similar -there is no outcry .Instead the racists are
attacking Muslims in Northern Ireland daily in what is even
according to the authorities an increase in islamaphobia. A young
Lebanese man is on a life support machine after a recent attack in
north London after he together with two others was attacked after
prayers at a local mosque.
What about the Extradition Act 2003 which allows fast track
banishment to the USA. Again there has been no outcry regarding the
fate of Babar Ahmed who is awaiting extradition or Abu Hamza who has
been spared the trauma of an American gulag for one of Blunketts.The
response to the same process for three former Natwest Bankers Gary
Mulgrew,Giles Darby and David Bermingham caught up in fraud
allegations with Enron executives who have admitted guilt, is
markedly different. They are not in custody but on bail ,and even
still engaged in business. When it was asserted that Babar Ahmed
would not get a fair trial in America the Whitehall Muslim shufflers
were pained as it was seen as being extremists. Well -the three
bankers have no such qualms and assert directly that their lives
will be screwed if they get taken to Texas and that they will not
get a fair trial [see The Lawyer 11 October 2004].Better still they
have the support of Liberty who have said that they will intervene
if the first stage of the extradition goes against Mulgrew and co
.They say its a breach of the Human Rights Act and they argue that
as the alleged events took place here the individuals should be
charged here. The arguments are familiar as they are the same ones
made on behalf of Babar Ahmed but in his case there is no support
from Liberty - but that’s not surprising - since nor did Yassar Siri
nor Abu Hamza or the other Muslims who have faced extradition. So
much for Liberty when the civil rights movement criticizes the
government regarding Belmarsh not on the grounds that it is wrong
and unjust but that it is a "propaganda victory for the extremists"
and "an own goal " by the government. Even worse that "it will
create martyrs for their cause".
What do we take from these events and failings by the defenders of
civil rights and those who lobby on Muslim issues. The lesson is
that principles that are right have to be defended no matter who is
the victim -yes even Abu Hamza -and that that the defence of the
principle has to be articulated in its purest form. In the UK and
elsewhere we have two legal systems -one for Muslims and another for
everyone else -it seems that we also have two sets of civil rights
-the ones for Muslims are less and defended with perverse logic.
Its high time that Muslims learnt that the only solution is for
grass roots activity linked with local communities based on the
principles of fairness, justice and equality. As the DPP says
himself, a whole generation of Muslims are being criminalised and
demonised. The need of the time is to understand that Muslims have
to join with right thinking and fair individuals to create campaigns
that are geared to raising awareness amongst the wider public of the
scandalous conduct of the government and their supporters. On the
basis of the record so far they will not get the right kind of
support from traditional sources - there has to be a new beginning
and a new movement otherwise the rights of not just Muslims will be
destroyed but all decent people who resist oppression and injustice.
Abu Yusuf
Human Rights Lawyer |