Verily, Allâh enjoins Justice and Correctness, and helping kith and kin and forbids lewd acts and all kinds of evil deed and oppression. He admonishes you so that you may take heed. (An-Nahl: 90)

Muslims In Britain are Being Turned Into Pariahs
"We have had enough of anti-terror raids, stop and search and a hostile press"

“BRITISH MUSLIMS have reached a turning point. I don’t think they’re going to take this for much longer,” remarked a seasoned TV news reporter attending a packed Muslim conference in Tooting, South London on a scorching afternoon, last Sunday.

The conference had been organised to discuss the 609 arrests since 9/11 of mainly young Muslim men under the anti-terror laws and, in particular, the case of Babar Ahmad. The 30-year-old computer analyst was first arrested at his home in Tooting in early December 2003 and claimed that he was seriously assaulted by several police officers at the time. He also said that he had been forced to kneel with his face to the ground — in the style of the Islamic prostration during prayer — while being taunted with cries of “Where is your God now?”

Certainly, the pictures of the clearly bruised Mr Ahmad which appeared in the Muslim press immediately after he was released without charge six days later, convinced many British Muslims that the police had indeed trampled over the laws which they had sworn to uphold.

Just three days before the conference, and with a Police Complaints Authority investigation into the alleged beating still not completed after eight months, Mr Ahmad was rearrested, this time under a US extradition warrant claiming that he was a key al-Qaeda fundraiser. Those who attended Sunday’s conference were in no mood to believe these latest allegations. And you can perhaps understand why.

In November 2002, we were treated to front-page stories about the arrest in London of an alleged al-Qaeda cell that had been plotting to release cyanide gas into the Underground. As we now know, no one was subsequently charged with — let alone convicted of — any such plot. In April 2004, ten people were arrested mainly in the Manchester area. Several papers claimed that Manchester United’s football ground was the target of their bomb plot. No, no, boomed another paper, it was Manchester’s Trafford Shopping Centre. The ten were all released without charge, and the papers which had earlier speculated so assuredly and energetically did not feel it necessary to give their readers any explanation about this curious turn of events.

Contrary to the impression left by much of our sensationalist media and their perverse fixation with the ridiculous antics of Sheik Omar Bakri Mohammed and his tiny — and not very merry — band of semi-thugs, only 15 people have been convicted under anti-terror legislation since 9/11. And the majority of these convictions have been for credit card fraud or immigration offences.

For many years, Muslim immigrant communities in the UK had a “keep our heads down” mentality. But the relentless pressure of anti-terror raids and stop and search activities, together with a steady stream of virulently hostile commentary on Islam and its followers in our press, are persuading an increasing number of British-born Muslims that it is time to say enough is enough.

Many of them joined hundreds of thousands of their non-Muslim fellow citizens in the huge — and peaceful — anti-war demonstrations of 2002 and 2003. The Government ignored them. For months now these same citizens have been watching the wretched spectacle of ministers performing the most shameful of linguistic contortions to explain away the absence of weapons of mass destruction in occupied Iraq.

The War on Terror and the bloody occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan have intensified the prejudice that British Muslims experience. Last month, a BBC investigation found that job applicants with Muslim names were much more likely to be discriminated against than other groupings. CVs from six fictitious candidates — who were given traditionally white, black African, or Muslim names — were sent out to 50 employers by Radio 5 Live. Candidates with “white” names were far more likely to be granted an interview than a similarly qualified person with a “Muslim” name (by a margin of almost 3 to 1) or a “black” African name (by a margin of 2 to 1).

Last month The Sunday Telegraph published a series of four incendiary, anti-Muslim comment pieces by someone using the pseudonym Will Cummins. Apart from comparing Muslims with dogs (July 25), Mr Cummins offered us the following historical lesson:

“Christians are the original inhabitants and rightful owners of almost every Muslim land and behave with a humility quite unlike the menacing behaviour we have come to expect from the Muslims who have forced themselves on Christendom” (July 4).

Source: The Times
13 August 2004