Verily, Allâh enjoins Justice and Correctness, and helping kith and kin and forbids lewd acts and all kinds of evil deed and oppression. He admonishes you so that you may take heed. (An-Nahl: 90)

Terror suspects could be declared mentally ill to keep them locked up

Foreign terror suspects detained indefinitely in Britain could be sectioned under the Mental Health Act to keep them in jail, the Mail on Sunday has learned.

Legal representatives of the 12 detainees have been warned by lawyers in Whitehall that the move is being considered by `panicking' officials after the House of Lords ruled last month that the detentions were discriminatory and dispro­portionate to the suspects' alleged offences.

Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, is not bound by the Lords' decision but it is an intense political embarras­sment He has pledged to respond to the criticism in the next fortnight.

In March he must also apply to Parliament for the renewal of the anti-terrorism laws rushed in after the September 11 attacks on America in 2001.

Mr Clarke faces growing discon­tent on Labour's backbenches and the within the legal profession over laws and if MPs vote him down, the suspects would have to go free.

The Attorney-General has had to draft extra lawyers into the Home Office to try to find a solution accept­ able to MPs.

The detainees' advisers complain that any attempt to use the Mental Health Act to circumvent the rulling would be a `vicious irony' redolent of George Orwell's 1984.

They say many of the suspects do suffer from psycho logical problems, but only because of the legal limbo in which the Govern ment has placed them.

Last week, The Mail on Sunday revealed that a second lawyer appointed by Ministers to represent the terrorist suspects — Rick Scannell had resigned in disgust at the failure of the Government to reform the law.

The 13 remaining special advocates have resolved to give the Government `a few more weeks' to sort out problem.

Each year about 26,000 people sectioned by the courts, forcing them to be locked up until their mental illness has been treated.

Home Office officials admit that Clarke has complained about the `mess' left behind by David Blunket when he resigned as Home Secretary the day before the Lords delived their damning verdict.

He believes Mr Blunkett `failed engage' during his last six months the job because he was so distract by his affair with Kimberly Quinn

`Clarke was appalled by the state of his inheritance,' said a senior Government legal adviser. `He had this problem from the Lords to deal with on his first day in the job and was astonished by the lack of preparation.

`The feeling was that Blunkett had failed to engage properly with the issue because he was so distracted by the furore over his mistress.'

Shortly before Mr Blunkett resigred, he was quoted — among a number of disobliging remarks about Cabinet colleagues — as criticising Mr Clarke for `taking his foot off the accelerator' as Education Secretary.

Mr Clarke is now seeking assurances of fair treatment from the suspects' home countries to enable them to be deported without the risk of being tortured or sentenced to death.

Four Britons who had been held by the Americans at Guantanamo Bay are expected to return home today after the British Government secured their release.

Civil liberties groups argue that it is inconsistent of Ministers not to apply the same consideration to Britain's 12 suspects, most of whom are held at Belmarsh Prison in South London.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the pressure group Liberty, said last night: `It's high time that recent Government action on Guantanamo Bay was tlso applied at home. `Those detained without trial in the UK must be charged or rele~ sed immediately. It's not an issue of liberal values — it's the rule of law.'

Mr Clarke's team is also working on reforms that will allow evidence obtained through phone tapping to be admissible for the first time.

The changes to the Organised Crime and Police Bill will allow more terror­ist cases to come to trial, and represent a triumph for the police in a turf war with the security services.

M15 and M16 had argued that using such evidence would expose their working methods and allow criminals to find new ways of evading detection but Scotland Yard has convinced Ministers that without such a measure. which is common in most Western countries, they are powerless to nail terrorist masterminds.

Source: Mail on Sunday
24 January 2005