Verily, Allâh enjoins Justice and Correctness, and helping kith and kin and forbids lewd acts and all kinds of evil deed and oppression. He admonishes you so that you may take heed. (An-Nahl: 90)

Solicitors Attack UK Anti-Terror Laws

The expected return of the remaining British Guantanamo detainees should act as a catalyst for the Government’s reform of its own anti-terror laws, it was claimed tonight.

President of the Law Society, Edward Nally, said the impending arrival of the four men from the United States’ detention camp on Cuba should spur Home Secretary Charles Clarke into a major overhaul of the UK’s controversial internment legislation.

Nine foreigners have already won their case in the House of Lords over their indefinite detention without charge or trial, which was ruled illegal under human rights laws.

Mr Nally said: “What I hope the return of the Guantanamo detainees would do is provide a catalyst to convince the government to think seriously about whether it is their responsibility to apply the law, not weave around it.

“If it gives the government pause for thought then that is no bad thing.”

Azmat Begg, the father of Guantanamo detainee Moazzam Begg, has said he expected to be reunited with his son tomorrow.

The Home Secretary has said he will respond to the Law Lords’ ruling in the next few weeks.

Today’s comments by the Law Society chief were the first time the body representing 90,000 solicitors had attacked the Government’s anti-terror laws.

The nine detainees in the UK have been held without charge or trial at Belmarsh and Whitemoor prison for three years .

Mr Nally added: “Indefinite imprisonment without charge or trial is totally unacceptable.

“Some of these prisoners have now been detained for three years and the time has come for them to be tried or released.

“The rule of law must prevail and the Government can no longer ignore the Law Lords’ ruling.

“What is happening contravenes fundamental legal principles.”

Mr Nally went on that even a type of “secret trial” where sensitive evidence is with-held from the alleged terrorists would be preferable to the current situation.

Allowing no proper external scrutiny of the case against the detainees meant Britain was on the “slippery slope towards the erosion of the rule of law,” he added.

Last week Mr Clarke revealed Britain was actively discussing an agreement with some north African countries to ensure some of those detained could be deported without facing the risk of torture and execution.

Under human rights law, officials cannot deport anyone if they will face physical danger.

Source: Scotsman
24 Jan 200
5